You Might Be A Conservative If… (Priceless!!)

Voted up Ms CYPRAH but need I remind everyone that Freedoms in the USA are being taken away by both Republicans and Democrats. Though the listed hypocritical statements seem to hold true we the people keep allowing the nonsense of government, with both sides contributing to our certain demise.

Ms Cyprah

These are great!!

What a great find!

Thank you!

#4.

4: You believe Ronald Reagan was a devout Christian, even though he hated going to church, but any president who spends twenty years going to the same Trinity United Church in Chicago must be a Muslim.

They left out the part that Reagan believed in asrtology which is considered witchcraft in The Holy Bible. The Reagans asked these seer's to tell them when it was the right or wrong time to do something. Kind of like the first king of Israel Saul, when he went a witch to summon the prophet Samuel who had died earlier. Saul was none to pleased with what became of him.

Reagan conjured the spirits of demons and tried to act like he believed in God, just like many in the right wing christianity today.

Has to be simple for GOTPers to understand; remember, they're not big on education.

...What's good for you is only for you,f**k everyone else.

...You are a 59 year old man and are caught with a 26 year old female and DUI-ing,but pursue the thinking in which sex is strictly for heterosexuals and procreation.

...I can have an abortion because of _______(reason du jour),but anyone else absolutely cannot,under ANY circumstance,or it is murder.

...You are dubbed as a 'job creator' and receive a tax break because of it,but you have had this break for 10+years and HAVEN'T YET created a single job.

...You BELIEVE that the 'trickle down' ISN'T urine

Man,I could go on all day but I must stop. I have things to do. Maybe more than usual because of you asswipes. I have to go pick garbage for food...WHILE THAT'S STILL LEGAL even.

They want a leader, not a reader, as if the 2 were mutually exclusive....

In regards to number 2, just because I don't read full grenade trolling articles, which Newsvine claims to be cutting down upon...

Unions did not invent the 40 hour work week, in fact it was Henry Ford in a non-unionized shop after recognizing diminishing returns. So the fallacy that that is because of Unions is laughable. Likewise is the child labor laws. The Federal government passed child labor laws AFTER every state already had labor laws on the books. Unions once again were not the reason for those laws. Those are the two most commonly 'you won't have this without unions!' lies committed by the left. Continue on with your right wing bashing though. Just wish Newsvine was more honest in their moderation of "Grenade Trolling."

17: You believe corporations are people too, and are deserving of the same rights as the rest of us. Just not the same obligations to pay personal income tax free of corporate loopholes, or penalties for massive criminal behavior and tax evasion. In these matters, corporations are deserving of special rights.

18: And since corporations are now people too, you must believe in their right to a driver's license, the right to marry, to adopt children, etc. These rights shall not be denied to Exxon, Halliburton and BP (but still immune from the right of the People to try, convict and sentence to death any corporation that conspires to commit a felony… because at that point, they're suddenly not people again.)

19: You still believe Climate Change is a myth, and the recent record highs, lows, floods and droughts around the world coinciding with climate scientist's predictions are all an amazing coincidence. Oh, and Al Gore is FAT!

20: You believe when George W. Bush took the national debt from $5 trillion to $11 trillion, it was necessary for him to do so to keep America safe. But when Barack Obama added to it by trying to rescue the country from a second Great Depression, he was deliberately trying to destroy America!

My favorites.

I forgot an easy common one.

...You say you are not racist,but you simply dislike anyone who is not 100% white or heterosexual,regardless of character.

2: You're happy with your 40 hour work week, paid vacations and company-provided healthcare, but you're strongly anti-union, because those commies haven't done anything for you lately.

Jesse, I don't see any mention of Child Labor in there. And I noticed you didn't touch on vacations, healthcare, etc. when trying to "set the record straight."

Jesse-Az

Unions did not invent the 40 hour work week, in fact it was Henry Ford in a non-unionized shop after recognizing diminishing returns. So the fallacy that that is because of Unions is laughable. Likewise is the child labor laws. The Federal government passed child labor laws AFTER every state already had labor laws on the books. Unions once again were not the reason for those laws. Those are the two most commonly 'you won't have this without unions!' lies committed by the left. Continue on with your right wing bashing though. Just wish Newsvine was more honest in their moderation of "Grenade Trolling."

And just because Ford did it - more power to him - doesn't mean anything nationally.

The eight-hour day movement or 40-hour week movement, also known as the short-time movement, had its origins in the Industrial Revolution in Britain, where industrial production in large factories transformed working life and imposed long hours and poor working conditions. With working conditions unregulated, the health, welfare and morale of working people suffered. The use of child labour was common. The working day could range from 10 to 16 hours for six days a week.[1][2]

Robert Owen had raised the demand for a ten-hour day in 1810, and instituted it in his socialist enterprise at New Lanark. By 1817 he had formulated the goal of the eight-hour day and coined the slogan Eight hours labour, Eight hours recreation, Eight hours rest. Women and children in England were granted the ten-hour day in 1847. French workers won the 12-hour day after the February revolution of 1848. A shorter working day and improved working conditions were part of the general protests and agitation for Chartist reforms and the early organization of trade unions.

In the United States, Philadelphia carpenters went on strike in 1791 for the ten-hour day. By the 1830s, this had become a general demand. In 1835, workers in Philadelphia organized a general strike, led by Irish coal heavers. Their banners read, From 6 to 6, ten hours work and two hours for meals. Labor movement publications called for an eight-hour day as early as 1836. Boston ship carpenters, although not unionized, achieved an eight-hour day in 1842.

In 1864, the eight-hour day quickly became a central demand of the Chicago labor movement. The Illinois legislature passed a law in early 1867 granting an eight-hour day but had so many loopholes that it was largely ineffective. A city-wide strike that began on May 1, 1867 shut down the city's economy for a week before collapsing. On June 25, 1868, Congress passed an eight-hour law for federal employees[3] which was also of limited effectiveness. (On May 19, 1869, Grant signed a National Eight Hour Law Proclamation.[4])

In August 1866, the National Labor Union at Baltimore passed a resolution that said, "The first and great necessity of the present to free labour of this country from capitalist slavery, is the passing of a law by which eight hours shall be the normal working day in all States of the American Union. We are resolved to put forth all our strength until this glorious result is achieved."

During the 1870s, eight hours became a central demand, especially among labor organizers, with a network of Eight-Hour Leagues which held rallies and parades. A hundred thousand workers in New York City struck and won the eight-hour day in 1872, mostly for building trades workers. In Chicago, Albert Parsons became recording secretary of the Chicago Eight-Hour League in 1878, and was appointed a member of a national eight-hour committee in 1880.

At its convention in Chicago in 1884, the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions resolved that "eight hours shall constitute a legal day's labour from and after May 1, 1886, and that we recommend to labour organizations throughout this jurisdiction that they so direct their laws as to conform to this resolution by the time named."

The leadership of the Knights of Labor, under Terence V. Powderly, rejected appeals to join the movement as a whole, but many local Knights assemblies joined the strike call including Chicago, Cincinnati and Milwaukee. On May 1, 1886, Albert Parsons, head of the Chicago Knights of Labor, with his wife Lucy Parsons and two children, led 80,000 people down Michigan Avenue, Chicago, in what is regarded as the first modern May Day Parade, in support of the eight-hour day. In the next few days they were joined nationwide by 350,000 workers who went on strike at 1,200 factories, including 70,000 in Chicago, 45,000 in New York, 32,000 in Cincinnati, and additional thousands in other cities. Some workers gained shorter hours (eight or nine) with no reduction in pay; others accepted pay cuts with the reduction in hours.

On May 3, 1886, August Spies, editor of the Arbeiter-Zeitung (Workers Newspaper), spoke at a meeting of 6,000 workers, and afterwards many of them moved down the street to harass strikebreakers at the McCormick plant in Chicago. The police arrived, opened fire, and killed four people, wounding many more. At a subsequent rally on May 4 to protest this violence, a bomb exploded at the Haymarket Square. Hundreds of labour activists were rounded up and the prominent labour leaders arrested, tried, convicted, and executed giving the movement its first martyrs. On June 26, 1893 Illinois Governor John Peter Altgeld set the remaining leader free, and granted full pardons to all those tried claiming they were innocent of the crime for which they had been tried and the hanged men had been the victims of "hysteria, packed juries and a biased judge".

The American Federation of Labor, meeting in St Louis in December 1888, set May 1, 1890 as the day that American workers should work no more than eight hours. The International Workingmen's Association (Second International), meeting in Paris in 1889, endorsed the date for international demonstrations, thus starting the international tradition of May Day.
The United Mine Workers won an eight-hour day in 1898.

The Building Trades Council (BTC) of San Francisco, under the leadership of P.H. McCarthy, won the eight-hour day in 1900 when the BTC unilaterally declared that its members would work only eight hours a day for $3 a day. When the mill resisted, the BTC began organizing mill workers; the employers responded by locking out 8,000 employees throughout the Bay Area. The BTC, in return, established a union planing mill from which construction employers could obtain supplies — or face boycotts and sympathy strikes if they did not. The mill owners went to arbitration, where the union won the eight-hour day, a closed shop for all skilled workers, and an arbitration panel to resolve future disputes. In return, the union agreed to refuse to work with material produced by non-union planing mills or those that paid less than the Bay Area employers.

By 1905, the eight-hour day was widely installed in the printing trades – see International Typographical Union (section) – but the vast majority of Americans worked 12-14 hour days.
On January 5, 1914, the Ford Motor Company took the radical step of doubling pay to $5 a day and cut shifts from nine hours to eight, moves that were not popular with rival companies, although seeing the increase in Ford's productivity, and a significant increase in profit margin (from $30 million to $60 million in two years), most soon followed suit.[5][6][7][8]

In the summer of 1915, amid increased labor demand for World War I, a series of strikes demanding the eight-hour day began in Bridgeport, Connecticut. They were so successful that they spread throughout the Northeast.[9]

The United States Adamson Act in 1916 established an eight-hour day, with additional pay for overtime, for railroad workers. This was the first federal law that regulated the hours of workers in private companies. The United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Act in Wilson v. New, 243 U.S. 332 (1917).

The eight-hour day might have been realized for many working people in the U.S. in 1937, when what became the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S. Code Chapter 8) was first proposed under the New Deal. As enacted, the act applied to industries whose combined employment represented about twenty percent of the U.S. labor force. In those industries, it set the maximum workweek at 40 hours,[10] but provided that employees working beyond 40 hours a week would receive additional overtime bonus salaries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-hour_day

#23...you believe that only one television channel is telling the truth and the other 99 are colluding against you to help socialists take over the world.

What a great article.

I have another one to add to the list. You might be a conservative you feel it is important to protect is the life of the unborn child, but once the child is born, that child has to find a way to take care of himself throughout his entire life without the help of the government. If he dies because his parents don't have health insurance, so be it. If he dies from a gunshot because some crazy person was allowed his second ammendment rights, then so be it.

2x. You believe this seed has any value.

I wish I could vote Pink Caps comments up twice...that is sooo true.

You realize the left is going to portray you as a racist for not liking the policies of the current president.

No I'm pretty sure its the comments like "food stamp president" and "anchor babies" that portray conservatives as racist

Olyman

Start your own friken article you are off topic.

My personal favorite:

21: You believe America is a God fearing country, and that the Almighty protects those who believe just as you do. But it’s never crossed your mind that the majority of tornados, hurricanes and floods all occur in the Bible Belt.

Olyman...you might want to discuss this with Jesse-AZ

#1. You don't believe every left wing spoon fed comment nor agree with them without doing your own homework

Because, if you read Smith Cassidy, 1.11 above, you can see where someone didn't do his homework and, with a little investigation, wikipedia helped set the issue straight.

In case you didn't know it's a duplicate story, wouldn't pop up in the auto-notification since AI is just changing the links, recycling old material.

http://curiousg.newsvine.com/_news/2011/09/19/7847309-you-might-be-a-conservative-if

http://easyjjgrand3.newsvine.com/_news/2011/11/11/8748209-you-might-be-a-conservative-if-addicting-info

They, Addicting Info, aren't even bothering to change the picture for it, wow now that is some lazy right there.

But get them page views, get those ad clicks, make that dollar. Capitalism at it's finest. / sarc

#1. You don't believe every left wing spoon fed comment nor agree with them without doing your own homework.

I have yet to meet up with a right wing Foxbot or Rushbot here that has done their homework.

mike amended...or thought for themselves and not write a pre-programmed answer as told to them what to write and where to write it...kind of like their fav shows.

Smith Cassidy,

Can you provide evidence from a source that is not open for public edit? Wiki sites have their good points, but they are not necessary reliable sources because anyone can add to it.

Wiki is not allowed as a reference in any universities.

Lissa Rose
Smith Cassidy,

Can you provide evidence from a source that is not open for public edit? Wiki sites have their good points, but they are not necessary reliable sources because anyone can add to it.

That's true of everything, internet sites, books, etc. In other words, all information is only as good as those who verify it.

I searched "history of 8 hour work day" and came up with the following:

http://www.8hourday.org.au/pdf/888_fact_01_history.pdf

http://www.pbs.org/livelyhood/workday/weekend/8hourday.html

http://www.ehow.com/facts_5330171_history-eight-hour-work-day.html

Daniel A. Hallo
Wiki is not allowed as a reference in any universities.

That doesn't mean it's wrong by any stretch of the imagination.

That doesn't mean it's wrong by any stretch of the imagination.

Right, Conservatives don’t have any stretch of imagination, just fear, and It means it’s not reliable.

#5 you don't take everything someone says out of context and try to twist it or make into into something it isn't.

Like Romney's commercial making Obama look like he was speaking his own words, when he was actually quoting someone else?

#5 you don't take everything someone says out of context and try to twist it or make into into something it isn't.

Or like Mitch McConnel forcing a vote on Obama's budget that he'd abandoned for a revised one, so McConnell could say it was voted down 97-3?

Wiki is not allowed as a reference in any universities.

[citation needed]

Go to school.

Go to school.

I work at two and it's not true at either; Wikipedia can be used as a reference, but usually requires additional references as well - single-source references regardless of source are frowned upon.

You were saying?

Thanks, Smith Cassidy. I do appreciate that.

My school doesn't allow it to be used. The the professors at the universities I attended didn't allow it. If we used it, we didn't list it. We just listed the sources we used to verify what we found there.

Exactly.

Encyclopedias can be a good start to your research, but professors encourage you to find the primary sources or some serious secondary sources.

Using Wikipedia as your primary source will guarantee you are graded poorly or fail.

Encyclopedias are not what universities are about, they teach you to think critically or they are not teaching they are indoctrinating.

When did being conservative become excuse for being an A$$!?

professors encourage you to find the primary sources or some serious secondary sources.

Which is an entirely different statement than the patently false one from which you started.

"#1. You don't believe every left wing spoon fed comment nor agree with them without doing your own homework.

#2 You realize the left is going to portray you as a racist for not liking the policies of the current president.

#3 You understand that if you don't drink the kool aid presented by the left and the left wing news media, you'll be called a traitor.

#4 If you don't agree with the way government handles their assistance program you'll be accused of hating old people and wanting needy people to die

#5 you don't take everything someone says out of context and try to twist it or make into into something it isn't."

I find this response just completely laughable. The Left does not move in a herd. No one giving calls from the minarets every day at noon like Limbaugh. Nor does there seem to be a common news source because few liberals I know draw information from single sources. (Which really makes point #1 so foolish). Nor do I even know anyone on the Left I agree with lock, stock and barrel. That's simply not how we work. A complete misrepresentation.

A rarely do I see the term, "traitor" used when describing the Right. We are however disturbed by your lack of ability to make rational arguments. Why is it every time someone attempts to discuss FAIRNESS in this country they are shouted down with cries of socialism? IS that going to continue until the 1% hold 90% of the wealth or is there a limit? You are the one drunk from the Kool Aid. Your policies can and have done real damage to this country. A little admission of responsibility would go a long way toward showing you have any reason left in your being. But that will never come.

And most of all regarding point #2. If you espouse policies that result in the denigration of certain minority groups we are going to call you racist. The GOP doesn't even care about the black vote now that Cain is gone and he probably would have done about as well as McCain. You espouse colonial policies that favored the white landed gentry. We once excused those who held such beliefs because they were so prevalent at the time. There is no excusing them today. You believe in corporate welfare but not in assistance for the truly needy.

Not at the better schools it’s not! As it is left up to the proffesors to set criteria as to how papers are sited I have never taken an academic course that allowed wiki as a source, ever. And I’ve studied to 3 colleges and two universities.

Conservatives tend to be anti-intellectual and so are more likely to conform to the indoctrination of then use higher levels of thinking or critical thought.

If someone used Wikipedia as a source in one of my classes I'd hand the paper right back to them and tell them to do some actual research.

Dennis P McCann

The only way to learn anything substantial is to find out for yourself.

As a tenured university professor, I do NOT allow my students to use wikipedia as a source. Credible university professors dock, if not fail, students for use of wikipedia as a resource unless it is used to illustrate an error in common beliefs that is published in a wikipedia article.

As for who is responsible for the 40 hour work week and 8 hour day, it is historically noted that the unionized workers who pushed for the 8 hour day. In fact, Ford Motor Company would only start their 8 hour day 50 years after the Chicago Labor Movement began the push, and won, in America the right to cap the day at 8 hours. It would be the Adamson Act and then the FLSA that would make this a national standard. However, it is the principles of Marx that would help dictate the worker's profitability to labour output; also known as the surplus labour/labour power equation.

Don. Thank you. He is off topic!

No more so than cowboygrandpa, TPisFORtheBATHROOM101, and I'm just saying..., all of whom offered their own additions to the list (and that's just where I stopped, I believe more may follow below).

Is the topic limited to parroting statements that agree with your sentiments, those of the article, and insulting anyone who goes by the label conservative?

Ms CYPRAH

Your link is broken now too.

Guess AI had to recycle it again already.

Yes Jake it is. Follow suit or be collapsed. The mantra of the left. If you don't agree, we'll just supress your comments. Freedom of speech at it's best. Agree or be censored.

Talking BS in a forum, Interfering like a town drunk, and then being told to shut-up and let the adults talk or hit the road, is as American as apple pie! So grow up and behave or be gone,

Damn I love this country.

So a differing opinion is now BS or interferring? How rich. Not to mention the lack of so called adults you refer to. Blame the right all you want if it makes you feel better. Fact of the matter is both parties are killing us. It's evidently easier to point the finger and fight with those of differing opinions than admit the truth. If we don't unite and work together against those not working in our best interest, party being irrelevant, we will fail. It's your choice succeed as one or fail divided.

"When patience has begotten false estimates of its motives, when wrongs are pressed because it is believed they will be borne, resistance becomes morality." --Thomas Jefferson to M. deStael, 1807. ME 11:282

So a differing opinion is now BS or interfering?

Hell yes if it's based on illogic, ignorances and the refusal to acknowledge facts which is either evil malice or stupidity, exaggerated BS, lies or just made to disrupt and deflect from intelligent discussions from fear mongering cowards and chicken littles seeing boogie men under beds, promoting old based out arguments that have been discussed and dismissed as BS, sometimes centuries ago, but the idiots can't learn this even if their noses are rubbed in it. Hell Yes STFU!

"Those characters wherein fear predominates over hope may apprehend too much from...instances of irregularity. They may conclude too hastily that nature has formed man insusceptible of any other government than that of force, a conclusion not founded in truth nor experience." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787.

Damn I love this country.

Hell yes if it's based on illogic..

So, you want a sound argument do you. Lets put that to the test shall we. This is a hot button topic right now, so how about this one:

17. You believe corporations are people too, and are deserving of the same rights as the rest of us.

Misrepresentation of the position. The argument is they are vehicles people use, that people do not lose their rights when they act collectively such as through a corporation or a union. Person-hood in the corporate sense, has to do with a simplified framework for property ownership and transfer between shareholders along with allowing for an ease in transition of business operations. That particular bit is more in line with the way that liberals wrongly portray what a corporation is, not the position of conservatives.

Just not the same obligations to pay personal income tax free of corporate loopholes,

Another illogical argument. These corporate loopholes are of equal legal basis as those "loopholes" for mortgage interest deductions, IRA deductions, child care deductions, etc. People who own the corporation are taxed once when the corporate entity gets taxed on "its" income, and then they get taxed on that same money (which was theirs even when still in the corporate account) when it is distributed to them as earnings.

So basically we have said if you want to be a part owner of a business, and enjoy limited exposure to liability you must pay taxes on that money multiple times. Seems just as fair of an interpretation as what we've seen in the seed itself.

or penalties for massive criminal behavior and tax evasion.

I was unaware of a massive repeal of the fraud statutes, which include fines that can be levied against businesses and imprisonment that can be imposed on individuals who commit criminal acts.

Its kind of a silly argument to say we should lock up buildings and pieces of paper (whoops should have read #18 huh)

In these matters, corporations are deserving of special rights.

Which "special rights" is this about? Limited liability, that is the right of an individual, not a corporation. Corporations do not have limited liability, people do. Right to due process before seizure of property? That is my right as a shareholder. As a shareholder I am a part owner of the property and capital which is really what makes up a corporation. It is my property, or my share of the property that is protected from that seizure without due process.

What special rights do you think they had in mind here? This particular one was indicated as being "brilliant in its simplicity!" They have it backwards, their overly simplistic hyperbole demonstrates these are sound bites, not thought out positions.

You've implied you have a low tolerance for "illogic, ignorances,..., exaggerated BS, lies or just made to disrupt and deflect from intelligent discussions from fear mongering cowards.." so have you told anyone who parrots #17 they should STFU?

17. You believe corporations are people too, and are deserving of the same rights as the rest of us.

"I hope we shall... crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country." --Thomas Jefferson to George Logan, 1816.

Where then is our republicanism to be found? Not in our constitution certainly, but merely in the spirit of our people. That would oblige even a despot to govern us republicanly. Owing to this spirit, and to nothing in the form of our constitution, all things have gone well. But this fact, so triumphantly misquoted by the enemies of reformation, is not the fruit of our constitution, but has prevailed in spite of it. Our functionaries have done well, because generally honest men. If any were not so, they feared to show it.

But it will be said, it is easier to find faults than to amend them. I do not think their amendment so difficult as is pretended. Only lay down true principles, and adhere to them inflexibly. Do not be frightened into their surrender by the alarms of the timid, or the croakings of wealth against the ascendency of the people. ~Letter to Samuel Kercheval, Thomas Jefferson (July 12, 1816)

Maybe if this next axiom, Axiom, is not enough for you I have to assume you are either stupid or an avarice egomaniac with delusions of Monarchism, but without a doubt Anti-soical and Aniti_American..even evil and anti-civilazation!

"An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics." -- Plato

And If you want to cut more Taxes to the wealthy to create jobs after Bush you are all insane.
So yes, The GOP has not only gone too Far-Right, they have gone beyond the fringe, have NO credibility and need to Shut-Up and get to the back of the bus or get thrown out!

"[Those] quondam leaders [who cover] under [a] mask... hearts devoted to monarchy... have a right to tolerance, but neither to confidence nor power." --Thomas Jefferson to John Dickinson, 1801.

Daniel #1.41. 3 universities and 2 colleges,yet your spelling and grammar are atrocious,at least in that comment. Were you overtired or studying at the time? Are you foreign and learning English? I would just like to know.

I'm not sure what you're referencing to,but yeah,Jake is right. I often see comments collapsed which shouldn't be IMO,and they often seem to be simply by disagreeing.

That is one unforunate feature on here. Everyone has an opinion and should be able to vent or whatever they like. Many of the collapsed comments don't usually contain personal attacks.

Oh this is a great game! You might be a conservative if: Your moralistic stances of marriage, abortion, religion, and in general all things that aren't really any of your business is NEVER reflected in the candidate you select for your nominee. So in effect you have no credibility as a values voter or a values party and the rest of us should just tell you to Shut up about it!

http://TPisFORtheBATHROOM101.newsvine.com/   ;grammar are atrocious

How do you spell WTF?

Don’t like little keyboards in taxi’s. You're a rude a crass little diction Nazi aren’t you.

Is this like I’m christian, but not the RIGHT kind of Christian BS>>>•¿•

Okayyy,daniel,y'all like to quote partial sentences and hack them in order to make you feel superior..I guess. Try the entire sentence.

Daniel #1.41. 3 universities and 2 colleges,yet your spelling and grammar are atrocious,at least in that comment.

It makes more sense now. I simply asked about your #1.41,that's all.

Not at the better schools it’s not! As it is left up to the proffesors to set criteria as to how papers are sited I have never taken an academic course that allowed wiki as a source, ever. And I’ve studied to 3 colleges and two universities.

Conservatives tend to be anti-intellectual and so are more likely to conform to the indoctrination of then use higher levels of thinking or critical thought.

I would like to know what you see in this. For one,I see an entire quote. For another,3 colleges and 2 universities??? Ask for a refund. Ask the professors face-to-face,I would. But hey,if you don't see anything wrong,go with it. Woooo.

If you want to claim about studying at all those places,I simply would think that you would be knowledgable enough to know spelling/English. I merely asked nicely,but thanks for your take on my lifestyle.

heilll rrright!!! Dey vill alvays be rrright,but very rarely correct.

Okayyy,daniel,y'all like to quote partial sentences and hack them in order to make you feel superior..I guess. Try the entire sentence.

Can we start with that one?

heilll rrright!!! Dey vill alvays be rrright,but very rarely correct.

No, that one would be more fun.

By the way, a space after a comma is a wonderful thing.

#1.60

Oh Damn, I wasn’t an English major…wasted my time in Marketing and design...

COH, read it.

This is just the typical "ad hominem abusive. (Insults and damaging facts simply do not undermine what logical support there might be for one's opponent's arguments or assertions)" from the far-Right who have no credibility and think they gain it if they attack everyone else’s.

These cheap Red Herrings attacks are made to obfuscate the message..

"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." --Thomas Jefferson to Dr. Benjamin Rush of September 23, 1800.

That includes Far-Right Gammer Nazi’s from the fringe.

With all dat edumication,you would think one would be able to form sentences,spell correctly,and all that.

Uh-huh.

As for me,English wudn't meye major,but

Do I even need to say it?

Yes Ms CYPRAH, far to long, and if anyone wishes to see the reason for this off subject grammar attack, or if you ever see this in Newsvine, go up thread and read what truth the Far-Right want to hide by using this tactic of propaganda.

They pull these dirty-tricks to "turn others off" from particapating in the Article as well, as they may not comment and move on or just stop tracking it as these Red Herrings arguments begin to dominate.

Yes, and being as fair and honest as you naturally are, and as most are, this used against us and seen as weakness to the Far-Right predators who are and always have been a minority who have a weaker moral sense, yet claim they are the Chosen and have the Divine Right to Rule… But it's these qualities that make us stronger.