Visit Ms CYPRAH's column >>

MS CYPRAHHome Page

Over-Sixty, Sexy, Savvy, Soaring and Single!
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 1142; Links Seeded: 2118
Member Since: 6/2007

Is this the Best Endorsement Barack Obama has ever had?

Barack Obama
(www.newyorker.com)

advertisement

A few months ago the New Yorker was in deep trouble for its cover cartoon of Barack Obama and his wife Michelle in suggestive terrorist garb being anti-American. It was supposed to be satire, to give everyone a good laugh, to show Republican smearers how ridiculous they were, as it couldn't possibly be true in any sense. But it backfired spectacularly as many, many readers, not too schooled in the art of satire, failed to see the joke and were not amused. Now, the latest October issue carries a ringing endorsement of Barack Obama as the next leader of the free world as yet unparalleled anywhere else.

If a picture paints a thousand words, then the 4000-word editorial, headlined simply and ominously, The Choice, explaining why Barack Obama is perfectly right as the next president of America, paints the most transparent picture of leadership, competence, suitability, good judgement, hope and change. No gushing words are left untouched to challenge readers into making the right decision on November 4th. The New Yorker sees the chance of leaping ahead of the media pack in acknowledging what now seems inevitable and is proffering the crown even before Barack is anywhere near the throne. At least they are not flogging the dead horse of expectancy relating to John McCain and Sarah Palin, but facing up to the grim reality of the strong, unified, bi-partisan leadership America now needs and the fact that it won't be coming from the McCain-Palin camp.

This is very brave of any medium just now to stick their neck out so unequivocally to endorse Obama when there are still 25 agonising days to go before the nation speaks, and anything at all could happen, including the assassination of the heir apparent, judging by the worried reaction of some concerned supporters following recent rallies of Sarah Palin and the racist behaviour of some of her supporters. However, one would hope that America has matured and moved a long way from those dark days of vigilantism and racist angst.

The New Yorker article is extremely interesting, informative and very timely. It is a shot in the arm for any wavering doubters and a stark reminder of why Barack Obama is truly formidable at this moment in time.

The excerpt below is nothing short of inspiring:

"We cannot expect one man to heal every wound, to solve every major crisis of policy. So much of the Presidency, as they say, is a matter of waking up in the morning and trying to drink from a fire hydrant. In the quiet of the Oval Office, the noise of immediate demands can be deafening. And yet Obama has precisely the temperament to shut out the noise when necessary and concentrate on the essential. The election of Obama, "a man of mixed ethnicity, at once comfortable in the world and utterly representative of twenty-first-century America" would, at a stroke, reverse our country's image abroad and refresh its spirit at home. His ascendance to the Presidency would be a symbolic culmination of the civil- and voting-rights acts of the nineteen-sixties and the century-long struggles for equality that preceded them. It could not help but say something encouraging, even exhilarating, about the country, about its dedication to tolerance and inclusiveness, about its fidelity, after all, to the values it proclaims in its textbooks. At a moment of economic calamity, international perplexity, political failure, and battered morale, America needs both uplift and realism, both change and steadiness. It needs a leader temperamentally, intellectually, and emotionally attuned to the complexities of our troubled globe. That leader's name is Barack Obama."

Amen to that! Is it time for America to stop resisting and let change take its natural course?

Enjoy: The Choice!

  • 39 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
114
24
7.6
{"commentId":3415258,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

 It could not help but say something encouraging, even exhilarating, about the country, about its dedication to tolerance and inclusiveness, about its fidelity, after all, to the values it proclaims in its textbooks.

Ain't that just the truth?! :o)

{"commentId":3415258,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:53 AM EDT
{"commentId":3415855,"authorDomain":"ffeineandsugar"}

Sometimes, just the truth is all you need. ;:-)

{"commentId":3415855,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"ffeineandsugar"}
  • 8 votes
#1.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:24 AM EDT
{"commentId":3416109,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

Yes, you can say that again!! :o)

{"commentId":3416109,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 8 votes
#1.2 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
{"commentId":3417575,"authorDomain":"moeloe"}

Beautiful!   I am going to make a point of buying the New Yorker this week.   I usually get most of my news online (my weak attempt to save the planet by saving some trees) - but this is one issue I want to keep! 

{"commentId":3417575,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"moeloe"}
  • 9 votes
#1.3 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
{"commentId":3417980,"authorDomain":"loosecannon"}

The problem here is that anyone with an IQ high enough to read a 4000-word article in the New Yorker is already voting for Obama. In fact, I predict this will be used by McCain to illustrate another example of Obama being part of the "liberal elite."


They endorsed Kerry in 2004, that didn't work out so well either. I appreciate their passion and agree that it's the most important election in our history, but sometimes people (like Michael Moore) and entities (like the New Yorker) need to take a step back and see how their endorsement will really play with the undecideds.

{"commentId":3417980,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"loosecannon"}
  • 5 votes
#1.4 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:08 PM EDT
{"commentId":3418557,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

The problem here is that anyone with an IQ high enough to read a 4000-word article in the New Yorker is already voting for Obama. In fact, I predict this will be used by McCain to illustrate another example of Obama being part of the "liberal elite."

You could be right with this, loosecannon, but I guess, at this stage, anything for Obama will be used against him to thwart his success. His supporters might as well just get on with it and leave it in the lap of the gods! 

{"commentId":3418557,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
{"commentId":3430128,"authorDomain":"sedna"}

Yes, McCain will twist anything like this around, but it is a timely counter to the "mistake" now reported on some of the absentee ballots in upstate new York.  Evidently absentee ballots sent to voters in Rensselaer County listed the presidential candidates as John McCain and Barack Osama. They caught it and corrected it, but... some mistake.

This endorsement is terriffic - good stuff Ms Cyprah.

{"commentId":3430128,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"sedna"}
  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:05 AM EDT
{"commentId":3430614,"authorDomain":"barbara474"}

Good post Ms Cyprah.  When that issue came out in July, I cancelled my subscription and fired off a scathing letter.  Not because I did not understand satire, but because I was afraid of the hate and divisiveness of those who would misunderstand.

I may reinstate my subscription, if I ever get an answer on my letter.  I won't hold my breath.

Sorry to meander OT.  This article goes a long way to heal many wounds.  Thank you for making it more visible.

{"commentId":3430614,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"barbara474"}
  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
{"commentId":3437729,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

  This article goes a long way to heal many wounds.  Thank you for making it more visible.

I am very pleased with that, Barbara, as I like to give credit where it is due. If we knock them at the bad times, then they should be applauded at the good times too. :o)

{"commentId":3437729,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 4 votes
#1.8 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3417789,"authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}

But it backfired spectacularly as many, many readers, not too schooled in the art of satire, failed to see the joke and were not amused

sorry i take exception to that.. i say the ones that dont understand satire is the New Yorker.

Everyoen knows you cant post satire without the satire tag anymore. or at the very least a winking smilie.  ;)

{"commentId":3417789,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
{"commentId":3417955,"authorDomain":"jcunningha"}

Finally the media acknowledged what we have know for sometime, that Obama may actually be the one that we have all waited for. Our very own modern version of a Jefferson, Lincoln, T.R. or J.F.K., one that inspires cynics like myself to get off their bagel chomping dupas and get involved to change the direction of our country and our mission in the greater world.

I believe that he will weather the next few weeks becoming stronger and emerging from the furnace of political conflict forged and prepared to take the stage as the leader which we can all follow and admire.  

{"commentId":3417955,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"jcunningha"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
{"commentId":3418631,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

I believe that he will weather the next few weeks becoming stronger and emerging from the furnace of political conflict forged and prepared to take the stage as the leader which we can all follow and admire. 

Beautifully said, Luther, because that's exactly what will happen. If this man stood no chance he would have been out of the race ages ago. Yet he has fought every obstacle to be at this point, and from nowhere too. He deserves to be in the White House for sheer audacity, tenacity and determination.

{"commentId":3418631,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 5 votes
#3.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3418371,"authorDomain":"sperrys"}

I wish all media would follow suit...if not in ringing endorsements, then in not promoting Mccain and Palin's racism and false charadcter attacks by covering their angst-driven KKK rallies on their stations...they would be doing this country a great service

{"commentId":3418371,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"sperrys"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#4 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":3418642,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

Hear, hear, Lisa. Well said. :o)

{"commentId":3418642,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 6 votes
#4.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
{"commentId":3429713,"authorDomain":"sperrys"}

Looks like McCain finally got the message tonight..although, his sudden shift to respecting Obama calls into question his motives...I have learned to prepare for any move he makes to be nothing more than a ploy!

{"commentId":3429713,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"sperrys"}
  • 7 votes
#4.2 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:31 PM EDT
{"commentId":3431718,"authorDomain":"clariflutist73"}

Lisa, I too saw McCain do a 180 tonight and shift into "respecting" Obama.  But you know what?  I, like you, don't buy it.  I am a pessimist when it comes to these kinds of things.  I don't buy the crap that comes out of McCains self-serving mouth for one instant.  He is scared out of his mind by the rabble of hatred he has helped awaken.  He is no longer in control of anything (not that he ever was to begin with).

I have learned to prepare for any move he makes to be nothing more than a ploy!

I have to agree with you that on 100%

{"commentId":3431718,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"clariflutist73"}
  • 4 votes
#4.3 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":3431832,"authorDomain":"barbara474"}

Ladies, I most heartily agree.

{"commentId":3431832,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"barbara474"}
  • 3 votes
#4.4 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:02 AM EDT
{"commentId":3437747,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

He is scared out of his mind by the rabble of hatred he has helped awaken.  He is no longer in control of anything (not that he ever was to begin with).

Spot on, with this comment. That's why McCain is acting like this now, whereas they didn't care less earlier in the week. they thought they were being clever until it got out of hand.

{"commentId":3437747,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 4 votes
#4.5 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:50 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3419151,"authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}

I am proud to live in a country where an African-American "skinny kid with a funny name" has an opportunity to win the election for its presidency.

For my part, however, this particular candidate is unfit for the job... I've watched him ever since his wonderful 2004 DNC speech ("there is not a Red States of America, or a Blue States of America, there is the United States of America").  At the time, I thought Obama really believed it.... but now I'm not so sure.  He said he is running because America "is not what it once could be", and he went on a world tour that culminated in a Berlin speech where he apologized for all American shortcomings, real or imagined.  He is embarrased of America, which I am not. 

Look, Obama's election will signal to the world that America is a truly free and open society.  I will congratulate him and his supporters for this historical achievement. 

But let's be honest about this point: Barack Obama is not the agent of racial reconcilliation in America, he is the beneficiary of it.  America is so ready for the kind of change that the election of a black president will signal, that it will look past a myriad of questionable judgements, legislative votes, personal associations, and the utter lack of leadership or understanding he has displayed in our current economic crisis (and hey, I'm not going to argue that John McCain has done any better on this last point either).

And heaven help us over the next 4 years if the Democratic pary gets a super-majority in Congress... it will take decades to roll back the stifling bureaucracies that will be introduced.

{"commentId":3419151,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
{"commentId":3427208,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

And heaven help us over the next 4 years if the Democratic pary gets a super-majority in Congress... it will take decades to roll back the stifling bureaucracies that will be introduced.

You might not be wrong here, Nathan. Wherever you have too much power it is always open to abuse, as we have experienced with huge government majorities here. But I am not in agreement with you about the rest. Only time will reveal what Obama is like. No one can say before he has performed. It would all be wishful thinking based upon fear, especially when they can't foretell the future.

{"commentId":3427208,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 4 votes
#5.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:09 PM EDT
{"commentId":3429791,"authorDomain":"sperrys"}

I do disagree...he won't lead only for one party, he will lead all of us as one. His decisions will be predicated on three things: 1. What are the possible long term outcomes? 2. Is it good for this country as a whole? 3. Is it good for our standing in the world? His decisions won't be based on party ideals, but on the values he was raised to embrace. As a former Republican, I know that my values dont fit nicely into one party package...I'm voting the man, and this man is for the people...all people.

{"commentId":3429791,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"sperrys"}
  • 7 votes
#5.2 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:37 PM EDT
{"commentId":3430638,"authorDomain":"barbara474"}

Lisa, Hear, Hear!!!!! And I read you text to my husband (also former Republican). He says to say: Nicley done!

{"commentId":3430638,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"barbara474"}
  • 8 votes
#5.3 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:44 AM EDT
{"commentId":3431223,"authorDomain":"sperrys"}

Thank you Barbara and your husband! I passionately believe this. His message has been so consistent since I first saw him on TV at DNC 04 convention...I voted for GW (oops!) then, but have followed Obama since that speech...he has not let me down. When things get rough, I get worried, and then he calms me...every time...that to me is a leader.

{"commentId":3431223,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"sperrys"}
  • 7 votes
#5.4 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:38 AM EDT
{"commentId":3431906,"authorDomain":"clariflutist73"}

*waving her lil reformed republican hand*  Howdy!

{"commentId":3431906,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"clariflutist73"}
  • 4 votes
#5.5 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:15 AM EDT
{"commentId":3437773,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

I'm voting the man, and this man is for the people...all people.

Well said Lisa, because both candidates might represent their respective parties, but once elected they have to serve all the people, the whole country. Thank you for that reminder.

{"commentId":3437773,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 6 votes
#5.6 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:52 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3421861,"authorDomain":"Aunk"}

Hetep and Respect Ms. C, you write so nice, a wonderful rhythmic flow of softness and strength. The  excerpt  you presented is enough to cause me to go out and by my home town mag again.

The headline is a little strong for me but the content is not.

Clipped, tnx

{"commentId":3421861,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"Aunk"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#6 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
{"commentId":3427252,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

Hetep and Respect Ms. C, you write so nice, a wonderful rhythmic flow of softness and strength. 

Awww...that is so sweet, Aunk. Hetep and Respect. Your words flow rhythmically too. They are very affirming. Thanks for dropping by to reinforce the positive vibes. :o)

{"commentId":3427252,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 6 votes
#6.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:11 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3421911,"authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}

Nathan you really need to lay off the kool-aid. It's distorting your perception.

Questionable judgements and associations of McCain and Palin: Liddy,U.S. Countcil for World Freedom, Iseman/Paxson, Hagee,Thomas,Rick Davis,Bouscaren,J.Parker,Annenberg,Oregon Citizens Alliance,Richard Quinn, AIP,Jesus for Jews David Brickner,Bishop Muthee, and don't forget Palin was under investigation for alleged abuse of power beforebeing placed on the ticket,McCain not vetting Palin, choosing to go to a smear campaign when he said he was against such a thing.

Legislative votes: votes 90% of time with Bush, votes NO on Veterans issue(they gave him a D grading), voted No to money for the troops because it had a time-line.

Economic Crisis: Told of of America the Economy was strong and then latter that day told America we were in a crisis. Put his campaign on hold but not really and said he wouldn't campaign again until the crisis was handled, of yeah has continually voted to deregulate which is in part why this crisis came about.

Lastly, please read  in my recommend reads in my column to see what the Republican have done to ruin this Country over the last 8 years. Keep in mind McCain's policies on very much like Bush's.

{"commentId":3421911,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#7 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:02 PM EDT
{"commentId":3423426,"authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}

Hmmmm... how to respond.....
First, you are attacking points I haven't made.  My points were all about Obama not being ready for prime-time, and I made no mention of John McCain, except to point out that I haven't been impressed with his handling of the economic crisis of the past few weeks. 
Second, can't I have an informed opinion that I formed on my own, using my own observation, without being accused of being a kool-aid drinker?  I have been watching Obama for 4 years, and I originally liked him, even considered voting for him... but I have really been disappointed in what I've seen from him in the last year.  The "change" guy is nothing new after all.  Bummer.
Third, who's the kool-aid drinker, when you throw out stats like "voted with Bush 90% of the time"?  What does that even mean?  Bush is the president, he doesn't vote on legislation.  He signs legislation.  You must mean that McCain voted Aye on bills that got signed into law.... this isn't a strecth of the imagination, given that one party has been in control for most of McCain's tenure.  And surely you must know that 90% of all legislation is passed unanimously?  Surely you know that the vast majority of legislation that is passed are things like congratulating Harley Davidson for being a great American company, or congratulating the New York Giants on their Super Bowl win? 
Lastly, in regards to the economic crisis: the "change" candidate has the burden of proof to convince you that things are bad.  Obama is reaping the benefits of the wild oscillations in the market (right now, it's oscillating down, down, down).  But I promise you that he does not really get it.  He may have been talking down the economy for years, but I can guarantee you he, like most Americans, had never heard of a Credit Default Swap before 3 weeks ago.  He doesn't really understand WHY the markets are down, he's just the political beneficiary.  It would be the same thing if the war was going badly... he wouldn't necessarily need to understand why the war was going badly, or have a real plan to turn around, he would just need to promise some nebulous "Change".  Fortunately, the war is going well.  Unfortunatley, the market is in trouble... but I promise you that Barack Obama did not see this coming... he just hoped it would. 

{"commentId":3423426,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}
  • 1 vote
#7.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:18 PM EDT
{"commentId":3423490,"authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}

Sorry, I edited a spelling mistake and now my formatting is wrong. 

{"commentId":3423490,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}
    #7.2 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:22 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3423654,"authorDomain":"maggiemayadkins"}

    You couldn't have said it better. I do not need to add anything.

    {"commentId":3423654,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"maggiemayadkins"}
      #7.3 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:31 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3424420,"authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}

      Nathan

      First I would like to say I'm sure Obama did see this coming. I saw this coming and it's been in the works since Bush took office with his bad economic plans.

      I have all the confidence in the world that Obama understands the economy. McCain on the other hand has not shown us and has even stated economics is not his strong suite. I see McCain as a very different man than you apparently do. I see a broken down old man that doesn't seem to have a grasp on the real world. Then add the Palin factor. Boy, she's a trip. I don't even know what to she in regards to her anymore. McCain is living on borrowed time (4 bouts of cancer with 65% chance of recurrence) and won't make it another 4 years. That would leave Palin who many Republicans have come out to say she is not ready to be VP let alone President.

      With that said can you give me any reasons as to why McCain is a better choice than Obama? Keep in mind I knew enough not to vote for Bush either time. Saw the mess he would make of this Country. Did you?

      {"commentId":3424420,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}
      • 4 votes
      #7.4 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:16 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3427330,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

       He doesn't really understand WHY the markets are down, he's just the political beneficiary.

      You're so right, Nathan, because that's why presidents have advisers! If he had to understand everything in government, the day to day running would be paralysed while he learnt them!

      {"commentId":3427330,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
      • 2 votes
      #7.5 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:15 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3427376,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

      I see McCain as a very different man than you apparently do. I see a broken down old man that doesn't seem to have a grasp on the real world. Then add the Palin factor. Boy, she's a trip.

      Hear, hear. Well said, Angie. Spot on. Obama and McCain are the only two candidates. Surely, if Nathan does not think Obama is up to the job, does he really think McCain is any better? Jeeez!

      {"commentId":3427376,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
      • 4 votes
      #7.6 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:17 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":3422077,"authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}

      Nathan
      Please check these recommend reads under my column

      The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush

      The Bush Budget Deficit Death Spiral

      The Make Velieve Maverick

      {"commentId":3422077,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#8 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:10 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3423478,"authorDomain":"etasch1"}

      Nathan - I understand how you might have interpreted Obama's comments as being negative toward his Country. But you must also understand that our European friends view us as arrogant and selfish. To admit we have some deficiencies is not unpatriotic, it is honest. We can no longer go around like Bush has done telling every other country we're better than they are. This is diplomacy, something that has been lost for eight years. We need international partners to solve world problems. If you have ever been in a position to lead, you know that others will not follow you if you think you are superior. I truly hope you will reevaluate your position on this, and recognize Obama's vision rather than falling for the "America can do no wrong" mentality.

      {"commentId":3423478,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"etasch1"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#9 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:21 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3427417,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

      If you have ever been in a position to lead, you know that others will not follow you if you think you are superior.

      Absolutely right on! A little bit of humility now and then goes a long way to bridge the gaps.

      {"commentId":3427417,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
      • 4 votes
      #9.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:19 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":3424430,"authorDomain":"blueherring2006"}

      I really don't understand why a vote against the democratic party in this election is conceived as a resistant to change.  People have voted against the Democratic party for as long as it has been around. Have we forgotten that Obama has affiliated himself with a political party? In all of this talk about change, somewhere we have lost the idealism of the party itself.  Many Americans do not agree with the politcial views or agenda of the Democratic party.  Many have been to quick to judge the reasoning of a Republican or any other party vote.   Telling us if we don't vote Democrat then we must be resistance to change is very narrow minded.  People want change, they prefer not to have it done the Democratic way.  No matter who was running on the Democratic ticket, many Americans swould not vote for them.  Barack is running for to be President for the Democratic party, not for the Obama party. 

      {"commentId":3424430,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"blueherring2006"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#10 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:17 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3427593,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
       No matter who was running on the Democratic ticket, many Americans swould not vote for them. Barack is running for to be President for the Democratic party, not for the Obama party.

      A most valid point, thank you, which we all need to bear in mind at this interesting and stressful time.

      {"commentId":3427593,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
      • 2 votes
      #10.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:27 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":3426225,"authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}

      nohandouts

      I kind of understand what your saying but, IMO the people voting for Obama/Democratic Party see that he is the only candidate offering ideas of change. If a Republican was offering ideas of change or a better platform I would vote Republican.

      I do agree that people have strong associations as to what each Party often represents. If you look up the definition of Democrat and Republican you will see that Democrats (Liberals) are usually in favor of change or invite different points of views,favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs,open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc . Republicans(conservitives) disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.

      Historiticaly if you look at the Deficit charts, history shows when a Repubican is in office the deficit goes up drimaticaly, when a Democtat is in office it gets paid down.

      {"commentId":3426225,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#11 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:13 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3426794,"authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}

      Sorry about the spelling errors

      {"commentId":3426794,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}
        #11.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:47 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3427450,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

        No problems with the spellings. Some good points there. :o)

        {"commentId":3427450,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
        • 3 votes
        #11.2 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:21 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":3429248,"authorDomain":"blueherring2006"}

        Thanks for your response Angie. However, I don’t believe a Republican vote is resistance to change.  In fact, I believe it is just the opposite.

        Our Founders gave us a Constitution and Bill of Rights that severely limits the federal government. Gives more power to the states which are closer to the people they represent. Guarantees most of the power remains in the hands of the people.
        Why? They understood that Power Corrupts and Tyranny results. They had to fight tyranny and were very smart about how to prevent tyranny.
        If the power is spread as widely and a thinly a possible, then you can prevent any one group or individual from becoming powerful enough to become tyrants.
        That philosophy requires each individual to be self-reliant, and responsible. It encourages work and permits each person to enjoy the benefits of his own labor. It also demands society hold the individual responsible if he uses his rights and freedoms to take away the rights and freedoms of others. 

        Liberal philosophy (as it is currently practiced) is similar to Socialism. It is a system where you are forced to "share" the fruits of your labors with those "less fortunate" by the extortion of your money (and money is power) through the POWER of government (taxes) and give it to the politically powerful to use as they see fit.
        That taking of your power places more power in the hands of a very few and creates stronger tyrants.
         

        Our government has been growing within the Democratic philosophy and is out of control.   We have lost sight of the intention of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Voting for Republican is voting for change.  Change the road we have been traveling and revert to following the ideals of our founding fathers. 

        {"commentId":3429248,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"blueherring2006"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#12 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:57 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3429885,"authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}

        I want to say first it's nice to not be attacked by someone because we happen to have different views. Thanks!

         I guess I'm a person who doesn't necessarily see Socialism as a problem. I think this Country got to selfish and forgot those (all people) who help make up this great Country. I believe in equal rights and not for only the ones who can afford it.

        Take my family for instance. MY husband is self employed works hard all day everyday and we still can't afford the cost of Private insurance for our family of 4. I guess what I'm trying to say is that it seems that no matter howhard someone is willing to work you still can't get a leg up in the world. I see the rich get richer, middle class disappearing, and the poor getting poorer. And yes, some people don't deserve help because they are unwilling to help themselves. But there are many Americans like myself but for some unforsaken reason like job loss, medical bills, have lost homes and their entire life savings. They have lost everything at no fault of their own but the greedy thieves on Wall Street walk away with Millions.

        I would like everyone to have an opportunity to make something of themselves.

        Lastly, I do find it kind of humorous that we see so differently as to whos philosophies have gotten out of control. If you would do me a favor and read the links from my column. The Bush Deficit Death Spiral, The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush, and the Debt Chart. I suck a posting links. Maybe you'll see where I'm coming from because I believe that McCain offers more of the same we have had with Bush.

        {"commentId":3429885,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"peek-a-boo-2"}
        • 5 votes
        #12.1 - Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3440924,"authorDomain":"blueherring2006"}

        I will read your columns Angie.  And I agree it is refreshing to talk with you about our different views without the underlying anger that I seem to read so much of.  I always try to be open minded and understand why a person feels the way they do.  Even though I may not agree, I still feel I should have respect for other views.  

        And thanks Ms Cyprah for letting me get a bit off course from your article.  Your statement just seemed to strike me that I needed to respond.  I have read and heard other comments referring to the same.  I think it's over used and feel that it does not really reflect many Americans. 

        {"commentId":3440924,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"blueherring2006"}
        • 2 votes
        #12.2 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":3441677,"authorDomain":"janalglaz"}

        MsCYPRAH

        Your column deserves to be at the TOP of Newsvine!

        I enjoyed reading all the comments as well.

        Barak Obama truely IS the Honorable and Most Intelligent man running for Presidency.

        He gets our vote.I knew from the start that there was something special about that man.

        {"commentId":3441677,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"janalglaz"}
        • 4 votes
        Reply#13 - Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:56 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3446583,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

        Thank you so much for that affirming comment, janalglaz. Nice to see such appreciation at times as this endorsement is very inspiring. :o)

        {"commentId":3446583,"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
        • 2 votes
        #13.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:07 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"384722","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"384722","contentId":"1980830"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking